Which is the best browser? Certainly it would have to be a standards-based browser, so that would rule out Internet Explorer 7 and before (IE 8 is at least better than previous releases, even if it’s still not at all outstanding). Preferably a good browser would be free and open source so that it offers a free and accessible platform for developers, so that would rule out Opera (which really is an excellent browser, though probably not a platform in itself). Safari meets the free and open source test (more or less given its relationship to the Webkit project), but given that it comes from Apple, there is some questions as to whether it can likely offer a solid and open development platform.
But offering all of those things is Mozilla’s Firefox and Google’s Chrome. So which one of those is better? Since Firefox has been around for a few years, it has a lead in the overall platform situation–many features, add-ons and plugins are available to modify the browser for myriad specialized uses, including the ability to use bookmarklets in the toolbar, implement IRC chat, use the Stumbleupon toolbar, and use local Javascript create UI changes on popular web sites like Gmail or Yahoo Mail.
But Chrome already has a plugin system in beta builds, so many of the popular tools available on Firefox should be available soon. So the really difference comes down to usability and performance. And those are the reasons I have recently gone back to Firefox after using Chrome for several months. Even though Chrome is really very fast, Firefox 3.5 has narrowed the raw performance gap compared to Chrome (and the also very fast Safari) for loading one page at a time. And in terms of handling multiple tabs and overall user interface, Firefox is just better. It can load a page that you open up in a tab, even with Flash in it, even though you don’t visit it. Chrome can’t really seem to load a page effectively unless you sit with its tab open, at least for a few seconds. In the modern multi-tabbed web user experience, it’s easy to see why Firefox is definitely in the lead for now.
Category: web2.0
Facebook sucks, time to move on
How close are we to admitting that Facebook is just the next Myspace, waiting in line to languish in obscurity and infamy?
I’ll tell you this–it looks like they’re slowballing my updates stream via Twitter. (I have my Facebook Twitter app configured to update my profile.) This could be Twitter API issues, sure, but based on the last few days I think that they may be simply waiting until a tweet is a day old before they put it into my “mini-feed” or “live feed” or whatever stupid name they use to refer to a profile page.
You know, Myspace is backed by vile Australian buccaneer Rupert Murdoch (if you don’t get my reference then you’re not watching enough Keith Olbermann), but Facebook is actually backed by people who are even worse persons in the world than that. Go ahead and research it if you want, there’s no reason to say any more about that one here.
Anyway Facebook’s user experience totally sucks–its photo sharing tools are right out of the 9th circle of hell, its visual design could best be described as DarkBlue Corporate Douche, its recommendation system is worthless, Microsoft is among its shareholders and the loathsome and idiotic Sarah Palin is becoming its highest profile active user.
All that was fine for a while because I would only use Facebook to post links to outside resources hosted on my own web sites and also auto-post an echo of my Twitter stream, and I would log in occasionally to find out what people were up to, because instead of having blogs with RSS feeds that I can read in Google Reader, many people I know (some of them otherwise rational, sane people) have decided to lock their data into a stupid web site where they have very little control over it (remember how Facebook claimed the rights to all photos posted on it for a while until they got caught and “changed” the policy?). But the Twitter auto-post feature acting slowly, perhaps intentionally, is probably the decisive event that turns me off to using Facebook for a while.
pacificpelican.us podcast #14
I’ve got podcast 14 out–it’s a trip through San Francisco, set in the Fillmore area and the Outer Richmond and packed with poignant drama and serious suspense–Will the lady talking loudly on the phone erupt in a rage as she notices my camera phone? Will the woman leering out the window the MUNI bus get out and do something about it? Will the caffeine-mad throng violently overrun the Peet’s on Fillmore?
All these questions and more answered–in pacificpelican.us podcast #14.
Actually, looking over it post-production I can’t help but think that it sort of strikes a somber note. Don’t know what to think of it really. I’m calling it the “film noir” podcast.
Oh, K2 1.0, what am I going to do with you?
With new versions available for the popular and powerful WordPress theme K2, I should be making the updgrade, right?
Well, no. First of all, I already converted my diary blog over to 2.3, and I really like it–the Javascript seems to load much faster, it has URL improvements, the tagging is integrated–check this post by Matt from WordPress for more info about it. Overall, it’s a great product, the web 2.0 blog platform.
But for this blog, I’ve it, at least for now, on 2.2.3 because I can use Twitter tools, Ultimate Tag Warrior, and all sorts of other plug-ins that the new WordPress taxonomy system breaks. And when I tried the new K2 release candidate 1, it just wasn’t the same. Now, the theme uses a lot of Ajax so it can have problems depending on browser, and apparently lots of these issues have come up with IE as they move to the new version Not that I use IE, but some people don’t mind if the occasional user of that clunker stops by their blog. The sidebar widget system has been badly redesigned in 1.0, with a clunky interface, and other issues keep coming up too. That’s what I loved about K2 0.9.6–the really cool sidebar tools, much better than the default WordPress ones–and the new 1.0 doesn’t seem the same. (If you want to try 1.0 make sure the find the latest version, which as I write this is release candidate 3, because some of these issues might be fixed by then.)
Google buys Jaiku – is Twitter angling to be next?
Well it’s out there–Google is buying short messaging service Jaiku. I’ve been a fan of Jaiku, and I guess it’s a sign of Google’s telecom ambitions that they are acquiring this rather cool service.
I’m using Twitter more and more to aggregate my content, but I think the RSS/atom feed inflow is a very cool enhancer that Jaiku offers and Twitter doesn’t yet natively.
This could change if Google adds lots of cool enhancments to Jaiku, but for now I’m on Twitter more. Here’s my “river” page that takes in all my tweets; here‘s my commensurate page on Twitter. You can see my Jaiku page here.
It’s worth speculating about who if anyone will buy Twitter now, although this may decrease the likelihood of them being acquired by Google as some people had predicted.
The Pownce situation as a management case study
The Case Study
You are the lead developer of a small but promising web 2.0 startup. As the young, intelligent engineer with a specific plan for the mechanics of a new web site, you find that interest is flowing in from many of your colleagues in the technology world.
As a key partner in the project, you pick an established but young web 2.0 figure who is a key executive at a social bookmarking site as well as at a tech podcast company. Highly popular among the tech fans on his site and well-known in the industry, your business partner may be the closest thing these days to a “rock star” of web 2.0. Skeptics might say that he is not yet particularly well known outside the Silicon Valley–but then the same can be said for Twitter, Ajax, even for the term ‘web 2.0’. You surmise that his track record of previous success and ability to gain over a million users for his still-growing social bookmarking site ensure that he will offer sound judgment in running and promoting your business as well.
Since your goal involves launching a site with a code base that you have developed as a side project, you decide to move the product as fast as possible to an open beta–and then have an invitation only version launch that limits the number of new users that can join. Your marketing is based on your contacts in the tech industry and the buzz you have been able to create on the web, especially on tech blogs which happen to be obsessed with micro-blogs, social bookmarking, tumbelogs and short messaging services. Your site has elements of all of these, has a modern, Ajax-intensive design and uses a certain kind of Python framework.
After a round of frequently positive reviews for your site, your invite system soon goes to work and people start joining in large numbers. Although you face many competitive threats from similar sites which also allow users to exchange short messages, you offer the unique value-added feature of file sharing. Many of tech’s coolest people join in.
Rushing to the market has gotten your site has established, and now you are racing to add features. For now your pro accounts promise only to take away ads and increase your file upload size; some consumers are expecting more from a “pro” account. You just added the XFN standard for the social graph, and there’s no reason that your site won’t become an important part of it. For now, you lack an open API like many competitors but are working on it.
In the mean time, your “rock star” executive has been working on stuff, too–at his other sites. Browsing the new features on his “social bookmarking” site, the project with a million users that he had previously been involved with and was now splitting his time with, you notice that they have now blatantly stolen one of the key design elements of your site. When people sign up, they now see an incredibly similar form for a certain question that users on your site also see at your sign-up page. As a user and even previously a vociferous fan of this social bookmarking site, you know this feature that copied yours has just been added. What do you do?
Background
Well, in the case of Leah Culver and Pownce, here’s the story:
‘Pownce co-founder Leah Culver has made a post to Digg suggesting that she feels the new social networking features that the site added last week were copied from Pownce. In the posting, which links to a now deleted Flickr photo, Culver writes:
“Since I originally came up with the Pownce gender list, I’m somewhat miffed that Digg copied Pownce.”’
My first thought on this–maybe she’s trying to make a point exactly the way she did, or maybe she will decide to handle disputes at a different level. Either way, I hope it works out well for her and Pownce–I think it’s a good platform, what it needs is more users and more file sharing methods in my opinion, but at any rate I despaired of using Digg a few months ago whereas I use Pownce every week.
Pownce’s strengths:
–new features
–popular entrepreneurs backing it
–tech-savvy user base
Pownce’s weaknesses:
–no public API (for user-built apps)
–limited user base
–no widgets for use on other pages
Pownce’s Opportunities
–Build “best-in-class” reputation for file sharing with web 2.0 set the way Flickr has with photos–then get people to buy pro accounts
–Match advertisers with tech-savvy user base
–Add features one at a time to build lightweight but useful social networking product
Pownce’s Threats
–Close competitors: Twitter, Jaiku, Facebook, Gmail
–Eventual bubble burst in web 2.0 inevitable
–Kevin Rose’s other sites stealing trade secrets from the inside
Microsoft on the margins
Microsoft still occasionally annoys; but with the rise of Firefox and its main backer, Google, it’s getting easier to use PCs all the time as more and more time is spent on the web browser platform rather than the Windows platform. With the bundling of Sun StarOffice with Google’s software downloads pack, it’s time to reflect on just how much ground Redmond has lost to Mountain View, and why on balance that’s a good thing.
I had a professor in college who taught a sort of postulate he called “the law of exact duplicates.” To illustrate it, he told the story of two people walking into an apartment. One person walks in and says, this isn’t my stuff! His friend says, of course it is this is your place, and I’ve seen this stuff before, it’s yours. But, the apartment dweller answers, someone came in and replaced every item of mine with an exact duplicate.
John C. Dvorak writes:
‘Personally, I wonder if the company can survive without Gates there on a day-to-day basis, berating the masochistic coders with his chiding. Two of his favorites include, “Do we actually pay you to work here?” and “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve EVER heard.” People always complain that Steve Jobs is a big meanie to the staff, but Gates is just as bad.’
But here’s where exact duplicates come in–what if Bill Gates if just a great programmer and businessman and is truly surrounded by idiots that really do totally exasperate and disappoint him, stifling the innovation he so vehemently works for?
Ok, well, what’s the difference anyway. The point is that (even in the view of this Windows XP desktop user) Microsoft is a lousy company that treats customers poorly and peripheral stuff like the Zune and the Xbox 360 and the $60 MS Office for Students deal isn’t going to stop the momentum behind the platform being built on Firefox (and IE to some extent, sure) that will run just as easily on cool Apple machines and cheap Linux boxes as the old PC platform–especially if their latest operating system product Windows Vista, which I’ve never used, is as bad as some people say.
Microsoft, after all, has a long history of outright corruption in their busines practices, from becoming a convicted monopolist (a final verdict that the Bush administration arrived to late to overturn–though the judge who reduced the punishment went on to head the rubber stamp FISA court) to paying fees that belonged to Novell to now-bankrupt intellectual-property shakedown racket SCO.
Of course, Republican lobbyist and convicted fraudster Jack Abramoff worked for the law firm of Bill Gates’s dad until the end of 2000.
So the Google guys are paying NASA a million plus to land their private jet at Moffet Field. That’s not a big deal compared to Microsoft.
Seeing the screenshots of Microsoft’s answer to Google Analytics and trying to use the awful IE 7 (despite what people might say, it’s a terrible browser for what it’s worth; even Safari for Windows is better) to test pages today was just the reminder I needed to finally write this post.
Yes, Google has its flaws and downsides. After so much innovation with Ajax-powered apps like Gmail, Reader, Calendar and Docs, they seem to be sort of taking a break. But their programs in the online space are mostly very good, they keep getting better and they are much, much better than similar entries from Microsoft, who will always be off their turf outside the PC desktop platform.