Google buys Jaiku – is Twitter angling to be next?

Well it’s out there–Google is buying short messaging service Jaiku.  I’ve been a fan of Jaiku, and I guess it’s a sign of Google’s telecom ambitions that they are acquiring this rather cool service.

I’m using Twitter more and more to aggregate my content, but I think the RSS/atom feed inflow is a very cool enhancer that Jaiku offers and Twitter doesn’t yet natively.

This could change if Google adds lots of cool enhancments to Jaiku, but for now I’m on Twitter more.  Here’s my “river” page that takes in all my tweets; here‘s my commensurate page on Twitter.  You can see my Jaiku page here.

It’s worth speculating about who if anyone will buy Twitter now, although this may decrease the likelihood of them being acquired by Google as some people had predicted.

Hide your shameful crocodile tears you war-mongers

General George Casey, one of those “commanders on the ground” in Iraq, didn’t like the surge, so he was demoted.

And so then George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld brought in David Petraeus and sold the man as a new kind of leader, who conveniently enough backed escalation. I can understand why some people see him as a political hack.

All those crocodile tears over names he was called made you right wingers look pretty stupid, and weak, you know.

However the stupid debate in Congress over moveon.org’s ad ended up, it’s clear that as 2007 is the deadliest year yet for U.S. troops the “surge” is not “working.”

Now that “reconciliation” among Iraqi factions has been largely ruled out, it’s time for new leadership over the U.S. military in Iraq.

And America should take Britain’s example and start withdrawing, now.

And for those of you who will continue to insist that the project of turning over Baghdad to Iranian agents is an ever-turning tide about to sweep America to victory parades, stop pretending to care about decorum while selling a murderous war. It’s inane.

Friends of Mountain Lake Park

Jessica and I were walking through a dark stretch of Mountain Lake Park and back to the Inner Richmond neighborhood when we saw an amazing purple twilight over the tree line, and Jessica took a great picture of the view.

Located in the Presidio, it’s quite an excellent park–I’ve written about it before and we even made a movie about skateboarding there and a podcast starring its resident birds–and now I’ve noticed that it even has a web site dedicated to it called Friends of Mountain Lake Park.

Walking home drunk in Michigan

It looks like Michigan has been told that its anti-youth-drinking policies are unconstitutional. As this article notes, this is an especially acute issue around Michigan State University, where students are regularly harassed and detained like criminals for refusing to submit to illegal intrusions into their privacy.

‘A federal judge in Detroit today struck down as unconstitutional a Michigan law that allows police to force pedestrians under the age of 21 to take a Breathalyzer test without first obtaining a search warrant.

In a 32-page opinion, U.S. District Court Judge David M. Lawson struck down the state’s Minor in Possession (MIP) law because it “authorizes police officers to perform a search of minors without a warrant or legal excuse for not obtaining one” in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights. The decision does not apply to drivers of a motor vehicle and allows police officers to administer breath tests without warrants in emergencies.

Michigan is among a handful of states nationwide with an MIP law that makes it illegal for young adults and minors who are pedestrians to refuse a Breathalyzer test even though police do not have a search warrant. Those who refuse to take tests in Michigan are guilty of a civil infraction and must pay a $100 fine. In addition, police in some places — including Michigan State University — tell students that if they refuse to submit to a Breathalyzer upon demand that they could spend up to a dozen hours in jail.’

These policies are especially stupid because they punish the relatively harmless act of 19-year-olds walking home drunk after a party. Progress comes slow–it’s not surprising that the federal courts had to get involved to put a stop to these authoritarian “party patrol” police witch-hunts looking to bust people for “Minor in Possession,” the likes of which are unknown even in the college town areas of other nearby Midwestern states like Illinois and Ohio. Read the whole article and see what I’m talking about.

The American auto industry is not coming back

GM’s plan to transfer to the United Auto Workers Union the burden of their benefits tab is a bunch of financial shenanigans, for sure, but it’s more than that. It’s false hope for all the deluded boosters of Detroit and its failing auto industry. A whole bunch of room on GM’s balance sheet is great for the company’s executives–but it won’t fix the American auto industry’s fundamental problems–high costs, bad finances, and the worst management cadre in American industry today.

If GM declares bankruptcy, as they should, their assets can be liquidated and sold and that could be used toward compensation for bond holders, and the rest of the needed benefits could be picked up by the normal government agencies. But instead, GM is allowed to fail on its feet, which is being sold as a way to help retirees get benefits. But as usual in corporate communications, the more important reasons for doing something are left out–in this case, the shareholders of GM (largely investment firms) ensure value for their stock holdings, at least for now.

Management at the major auto companies has been very poor for a long time, and something like bankruptcy would probably be a therapeutic shock for GM to get rid of all those old-school managers (rather than the UAW workers that always get blamed and demonized by the media) whose decisions deserve the lion’s share of blame for the company’s problems. Looking for quick profit, these managers have turned GM into a bank with a health care division and an auto subsidiary. They backed one bad or mediocre new car idea after another, from the Oldsmobile Aurora to the Hummer H3. They decided in the 1990s to build their entire companies around heavy, inefficient, dangerous trucks instead of consumer vehicles. Now with the higher price of oil cars like Toyota’s Prius are big sellers, and though trucks remain popular GM extends enormous credit to buyers because they have become so expensive.

Aside from that, the management of the American auto industry are a truly flat-footed, narrow-minded, dim-witted group. This is an archetypal 20th century industry–they really haven’t changed, especially in the executive suite–and I wonder if anyone wants to try to convince me that the future of the car industry isn’t centered in Aichi, Japan.

The idea that some turnaround could happen in America’s car industry due to a shuffling around of debts is laughable. Put aside the failure yet again of our supposedly “free market” economy to function properly–or our failure to let it function–and just look at the state of Michigan.

When I was there at Michigan State in the late 1990s, the minor league baseball team in Lansing was called the Lansing Lugnuts and they played at Oldsmobile Park. After I was there for a few years the Oldsmobile division was completely shut down by GM. The collapse of the auto industry has turned a once-proud state into a place with declining income levels, slow growth and high unemployment. And that’s everywhere–go to the worst places, like the neighborhoods along the highway in the west of Detroit with its gray rows of abandoned, decrepit old houses that line sad old boulevards with only their width to testify to their former grandeur, while the streets sit strangely quiet with few cars and shell-shocked homeless people roll shopping carts over the ashes of the auto empire.

And by the way, even this deal with the UAW involving the setup of “Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association,” or VEBA, is a temporary fix. As the Economist magazine admits, despite its typical attempt to sell the deal because it benefits the company’s executives:

‘But there is also a potential downside, as the UAW has learnt to its cost. Two earlier VEBAs, set up at Detroit Diesel and Caterpillar, have gone bust.’

This industry is not coming back. Put a fork in it instead of more money.

The Pownce situation as a management case study

The Case Study

You are the lead developer of a small but promising web 2.0 startup. As the young, intelligent engineer with a specific plan for the mechanics of a new web site, you find that interest is flowing in from many of your colleagues in the technology world.

As a key partner in the project, you pick an established but young web 2.0 figure who is a key executive at a social bookmarking site as well as at a tech podcast company. Highly popular among the tech fans on his site and well-known in the industry, your business partner may be the closest thing these days to a “rock star” of web 2.0. Skeptics might say that he is not yet particularly well known outside the Silicon Valley–but then the same can be said for Twitter, Ajax, even for the term ‘web 2.0’. You surmise that his track record of previous success and ability to gain over a million users for his still-growing social bookmarking site ensure that he will offer sound judgment in running and promoting your business as well.

Since your goal involves launching a site with a code base that you have developed as a side project, you decide to move the product as fast as possible to an open beta–and then have an invitation only version launch that limits the number of new users that can join. Your marketing is based on your contacts in the tech industry and the buzz you have been able to create on the web, especially on tech blogs which happen to be obsessed with micro-blogs, social bookmarking, tumbelogs and short messaging services. Your site has elements of all of these, has a modern, Ajax-intensive design and uses a certain kind of Python framework.

After a round of frequently positive reviews for your site, your invite system soon goes to work and people start joining in large numbers. Although you face many competitive threats from similar sites which also allow users to exchange short messages, you offer the unique value-added feature of file sharing. Many of tech’s coolest people join in.

Rushing to the market has gotten your site has established, and now you are racing to add features. For now your pro accounts promise only to take away ads and increase your file upload size; some consumers are expecting more from a “pro” account. You just added the XFN standard for the social graph, and there’s no reason that your site won’t become an important part of it. For now, you lack an open API like many competitors but are working on it.

In the mean time, your “rock star” executive has been working on stuff, too–at his other sites. Browsing the new features on his “social bookmarking” site, the project with a million users that he had previously been involved with and was now splitting his time with, you notice that they have now blatantly stolen one of the key design elements of your site. When people sign up, they now see an incredibly similar form for a certain question that users on your site also see at your sign-up page. As a user and even previously a vociferous fan of this social bookmarking site, you know this feature that copied yours has just been added. What do you do?

Background

Well, in the case of Leah Culver and Pownce, here’s the story:

‘Pownce co-founder Leah Culver has made a post to Digg suggesting that she feels the new social networking features that the site added last week were copied from Pownce. In the posting, which links to a now deleted Flickr photo, Culver writes:

“Since I originally came up with the Pownce gender list, I’m somewhat miffed that Digg copied Pownce.”’

My first thought on this–maybe she’s trying to make a point exactly the way she did, or maybe she will decide to handle disputes at a different level. Either way, I hope it works out well for her and Pownce–I think it’s a good platform, what it needs is more users and more file sharing methods in my opinion, but at any rate I despaired of using Digg a few months ago whereas I use Pownce every week.

Pownce’s strengths:

–new features

–popular entrepreneurs backing it

–tech-savvy user base

Pownce’s weaknesses:

–no public API (for user-built apps)

–limited user base

–no widgets for use on other pages

Pownce’s Opportunities

–Build “best-in-class” reputation for file sharing with web 2.0 set the way Flickr has with photos–then get people to buy pro accounts

–Match advertisers with tech-savvy user base

–Add features one at a time to build lightweight but useful social networking product

Pownce’s Threats

–Close competitors: Twitter, Jaiku, Facebook, Gmail

–Eventual bubble burst in web 2.0 inevitable

–Kevin Rose’s other sites stealing trade secrets from the inside

Microsoft on the margins

Microsoft still occasionally annoys; but with the rise of Firefox and its main backer, Google, it’s getting easier to use PCs all the time as more and more time is spent on the web browser platform rather than the Windows platform. With the bundling of Sun StarOffice with Google’s software downloads pack, it’s time to reflect on just how much ground Redmond has lost to Mountain View, and why on balance that’s a good thing.

I had a professor in college who taught a sort of postulate he called “the law of exact duplicates.” To illustrate it, he told the story of two people walking into an apartment. One person walks in and says, this isn’t my stuff! His friend says, of course it is this is your place, and I’ve seen this stuff before, it’s yours. But, the apartment dweller answers, someone came in and replaced every item of mine with an exact duplicate.

John C. Dvorak writes:

‘Personally, I wonder if the company can survive without Gates there on a day-to-day basis, berating the masochistic coders with his chiding. Two of his favorites include, “Do we actually pay you to work here?” and “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve EVER heard.” People always complain that Steve Jobs is a big meanie to the staff, but Gates is just as bad.’

But here’s where exact duplicates come in–what if Bill Gates if just a great programmer and businessman and is truly surrounded by idiots that really do totally exasperate and disappoint him, stifling the innovation he so vehemently works for?

Ok, well, what’s the difference anyway. The point is that (even in the view of this Windows XP desktop user) Microsoft is a lousy company that treats customers poorly and peripheral stuff like the Zune and the Xbox 360 and the $60 MS Office for Students deal isn’t going to stop the momentum behind the platform being built on Firefox (and IE to some extent, sure) that will run just as easily on cool Apple machines and cheap Linux boxes as the old PC platform–especially if their latest operating system product Windows Vista, which I’ve never used, is as bad as some people say.

Microsoft, after all, has a long history of outright corruption in their busines practices, from becoming a convicted monopolist (a final verdict that the Bush administration arrived to late to overturn–though the judge who reduced the punishment went on to head the rubber stamp FISA court) to paying fees that belonged to Novell to now-bankrupt intellectual-property shakedown racket SCO.

Of course, Republican lobbyist and convicted fraudster Jack Abramoff worked for the law firm of Bill Gates’s dad until the end of 2000.

So the Google guys are paying NASA a million plus to land their private jet at Moffet Field. That’s not a big deal compared to Microsoft.

Seeing the screenshots of Microsoft’s answer to Google Analytics and trying to use the awful IE 7 (despite what people might say, it’s a terrible browser for what it’s worth; even Safari for Windows is better) to test pages today was just the reminder I needed to finally write this post.

Yes, Google has its flaws and downsides. After so much innovation with Ajax-powered apps like Gmail, Reader, Calendar and Docs, they seem to be sort of taking a break. But their programs in the online space are mostly very good, they keep getting better and they are much, much better than similar entries from Microsoft, who will always be off their turf outside the PC desktop platform.

Notes on podcast 11

Podcast 11 (remix) is now out–you can check it out on the pacificpelican.us podcast blog, or if you want to watch it quickly you can view the Flash video version at Webshots.

This is the second podcast shot entirely with my cell phone camera–the first was number seven. For earlier podcasts I had occasionally thrown in soundless video from my old Kodak EasyShare alongside my Samsung camera-phone video, and for podcast 6 at Yellowstone Jessica and I took a bit of the video with a borrowed point-and-shoot Canon Pro.

But one device was the anchor for the early podcasts. Essential video footage for most of them was taken with a Casio Exilim which really shined taking videos as well as photos, took quality sound recordings, and was both small and portable. Recently that camera, which we had used for a year and a half as our main video and still camera, broke and we needed a replacement.

As I mention on podcast 10, the new camera is a very cool Panasonic Lumix that has 10x optical zoom and lots of powerful features. As you can see from podcast number 10, which was the first podcast to use that camera, it also takes very good video.

However the Lumix takes QuickTime video that can be played on my desktop and even uploaded to my podcast server (as in number 10 which is just one uncut movie)–but I can’t edit and remix it with the software tools I currently have. So two more podcasts have been shot and produced but await mixing. For now here are the synopses: In podcast 8, Jessica and I visit Yosemite for our anniversary. In podcast 9, a car rams into the back of a bus that I am riding in the front of and I video the aftermath.

For now I think podcast 11 has some pretty interesting moments–and it’s a “remix” because I actually re-shot the “interlude” part (i.e. the first mix) and then added footage. One of the sequences is a sort of reference to my movie “The Dog of Geary Boulevard,” and another is taken from unused podcast 7 footage. The rest is totally new–more a sequence of random clips than anything, but feel free to surmise plot lines. Movies sort of write themselves in San Francisco.

“It does not include going into Iran”–Make a note of that, Lieberman

In the Senate hearings on Iraq, Joe Lieberman can’t get even General David Petraeus to mouth the words he wants about Iran. Here’s the general in response to Lieberman’s war-mongering and blaming Iran for all of America’s problems:

‘My area of responsibility is Iraq; it does not include going into Iran.’

So yes, there are actually hearings happening about the Iraq war. But wait– Jeff Sessions is now underhanding his softballs at Petraeus and Ryan Crocker right after that goon Lieberman tried to gin up a war with Iran?

Why are two Republicans going in a row? Is this really what American voted for in 2006? [But seriously–just because some fools in Connecticut, which is the land of George W. Bush after all, voted Lieberman in doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be thrown off his Senate committee seats for party disloyalty.]

It seems like Crocker and Petraeus are having a hard time selling this pointless war overall–a few Democrats have actually confronted them over their pat descriptions and summations and have landed some real blows for those actually listening–but I think I see what the ambassador and the general are trying to do.

They are making a very weak case for a little more war (it’s always sold a little bit at a time) and trying to cloud the issue, to convince a few Congressional idiots that “these [illusory] gains will stand up,” as Jack Reed gullibly put it.

Just keep shifting the area of emphasis, tell people to focus on one province now and a different one later, use one metric now and a different one later, blame “al Qaeda” today and Iran tomorrow and yesterday, ask for “six more months” every six months, keep using the word “tribal”–it’s a pretty stupid shell game, sure, but America has some pretty stupid lawmakers.